Paper detail

Two problems in graph Ramsey theory

We study two problems in graph Ramsey theory. In the early 1970&#39;s, Erdős and O&#39;Neil considered a generalization of Ramsey numbers. Given integers $n,k,s$ and $t$ with $n \ge k \ge s,t \ge 2$, they asked for the least integer $N=f_k(n,s,t)$ such that in any red-blue coloring of the $k$-subsets of $\{1, 2,\ldots, N\}$, there is a set of size $n$ such that either each of its $s$-subsets is contained in some red $k$-subset, or each of its $t$-subsets is contained in some blue $k$-subset. Erdős and O&#39;Neil found an exact formula for $f_k(n,s,t)$ when $k\ge s+t-1$. In the arguably more interesting case where $k=s+t-2$, they showed $2^{-\binom{k}{2}}n<\log f_k(n,s,t)<2n$ for sufficiently large $n$. Our main result closes the gap between these lower and upper bounds, determining the logarithm of $f_{s+t-2}(n,s,t)$ up to a multiplicative factor. Recently, Damásdi, Keszegh, Malec, Tompkins, Wang and Zamora initiated the investigation of saturation problems in Ramsey theory, wherein one seeks to minimize $n$ such that there exists an $r$-edge-coloring of $K_n$ for which any extension of this to an $r$-edge-coloring of $K_{n+1}$ would create a new monochromatic copy of $K_k$. We obtain essentially sharp bounds for this problem.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.