Paper detail

Two more hidden scalars around 125 GeV and $h \to μτ$

We show that the $2.4σ$ signal of the leptonic flavor violating (LFV) Higgs boson decay $h\toμτ$, as observed by the CMS collaboration recently, can be explained by a certain class of two-Higgs doublet models that allow controllable flavor-changing neutral current with minimal number of free parameters. We postulate that (i) the alignment limit is maintained, which means the lightest neutral scalar ($h$) has identical couplings to that of the Standard Model Higgs boson and (ii) the signal comes from two other neutral scalars, the CP-even $H$ and the CP-odd $A$, almost degenerate with $h$ at 125 GeV. We also show that (i) it is entirely possible that these scalars are hidden, apart from this LFV signal; (ii) the signal strengths of $b\bar{b}$, $τ^+τ^-$ and $γγ$ around 125 GeV put severe constraints on the parameter space of such models; (iii) the constraint is further enhanced by the non-observation of processes like $μ\to eγ$, and we predict that the branching ratio of $μ\to eγ$ cannot be even an order below the present experimental limit, highlighting the role it plays in forcing $H$ and $A$ to be near-degenerate; (iv) an enhancement in the $τ^+τ^-$ production cross-section at around 125 GeV is expected in the gluon fusion channel, and should be observed during the next run of the LHC; (v) the branching ratio in the $eτ$ channel is enhanced and is expected to be at least about $2\%$. The constrained parameter space and minimum number of free parameters, along with such strong predictions, make this model easily testable and falsifiable.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.