Paper detail

Two measures of efficiency for the secretary problem with multiple items at each rank

For $2\le k\in\mathbb{N}$, consider the following adaptation of the classical secretary problem. There are $k$ items at each of $n$ linearly ordered ranks. The $kn$ items are revealed, one item at a time, in a uniformly random order, to an observer whose objective is to select an item of highest rank. At each stage the observer only knows the relative ranks of the items that have arrived thus far, and must either select the current item, in which case the process terminates, or reject it and continue to the next item. For $M\in\{0,1,\cdots, kn-1\}$, let $\mathcal{S}(n,k;M)$ denote the strategy whereby one allows the first $M$ items to pass, and then selects the first later arriving item whose rank is \it either equal to or greater than\rm\ the highest rank of the first $M$ items (if such an item exists). Let $W_{\mathcal{S}(n,k;M)}$ denote the event that one selects an item of highest rank using strategy $\mathcal{S}(n,k;M)$ and let $P_{n,k}(W_{\mathcal{S}(n,k;M)})$ denote the corresponding probability. We obtain a formula for $P_{n,k}(W_{\mathcal{S}(n,k;M)})$, and for $\lim_{n\to\infty}P_{n,k}(W_{\mathcal{S}(n,k;M_n)})$, when $M_n\sim ckn$, with $c\in(0,1)$. In the classical secretary problem, the asymptotically optimal strategy yields a probability of success of $\frac1e\approx 0.368$. For $k=2$, the asymptotically optimal strategy yields yields a probability of success of about 0.701. For $k=3$, the optimal probability is above 0.85, for $k=7$, that probability exceeds 0.99, and for $k\ge12$, it is 1.000 to three decimal places. In the problem with multiple items at each rank, there is an additional measure of efficiency of a strategy besides the probability of selecting an item of highest rank; namely how quickly one selects an item of highest rank. We give a rather complete picture of this efficiency.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.