Paper detail

Two-gap superconducting properties of alkaline-earth intercalated $A_{x}(NH_{3})Fe_{2}Se_{2}$ (A = Ba or Sr)

Superconducting properties were studied on high quality superconductors $Ba_{x}(NH_{3})Fe_{2}Se_{2}$ ($T_{c}$ = 39 K) and $Sr_{x}(NH_{3})Fe_{2}Se_{2}$ ($T_{c}$ = 44 K) prepared by intercalating Ba/Sr atoms into tetragonal $β$-FeSe by liquid ammonia. The elongated c-axis and almost unchanged a-axis of $Ba_{x}(NH_{3})Fe_{2}Se_{2}$, comparing with $β$-FeSe, suggested an unchanged intra-$Fe_{2}Se_{2}$-layer structure and the $T_{c}$ enhancement is due to a 3D to 2D-like Fermi surface transformation. The superconducting coherent lengths $ξ$(0), Ginzburg-Landau parameters $κ$ and penetration depths $λ$(0) obtained from the extrapolated lower and upper critical fields $B_{c1}$(0) and $B_{c2}$(0) indicates that both compounds are typical type-II superconductors. The temperature dependence of 1/$λ^{2}$(T) of $Ba_{x}(NH_{3})Fe_{2}Se_{2}$ deduced from the low field magnetic susceptibility shows a two-gap s-wave behaviour with superconducting gaps of $Δ_{1}$ = 6.47 meV and $Δ_{2}$ = 1.06 meV.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.