Paper detail

Two energy scales in the magnetic resonance spectrum of electron and hole doped pnictide superconductors

We argue that a multiband superconductor with sign-changing gaps may have multiple spin resonances. We calculate the RPA-based spin resonance spectra of a pnictide superconductor by using the five band tight-binding model or angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) Fermi surface (FS) and experimental values of superconducting (SC) gaps. The resonance spectra split in both energy and momenta due to the effects of multiband and multiple gaps in $s^{\pm}-$pairing; the higher energy peak appears around the commensurate momenta due to scattering between $α-$FS to $γ/δ-$FS pockets. The second resonance is incommensurate coming from $β-$FS to $γ/δ-$FS scatterings and its $q-$vector is doping-dependent and hence on the FS topology. Energies of both resonances $ω^{1,2}_{res}$ are strongly doping dependent and are proportional to the gap amplitudes at the contributing FSs. We also discuss the evolution of the spin excitation spectra with various other possible gap symmetries, which may be relevant when either both the electron pockets or both the hole pockets completely disappear.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.