Paper detail

Two Embedding Theorems for Data with Equivalences under Finite Group Action

There is recent interest in compressing data sets for non-sequential settings, where lack of obvious orderings on their data space, require notions of data equivalences to be considered. For example, Varshney & Goyal (DCC, 2006) considered multiset equivalences, while Choi & Szpankowski (IEEE Trans. IT, 2012) considered isomorphic equivalences in graphs. Here equivalences are considered under a relatively broad framework - finite-dimensional, non-sequential data spaces with equivalences under group action, for which analogues of two well-studied embedding theorems are derived: the Whitney embedding theorem and the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma. Only the canonical data points need to be carefully embedded, each such point representing a set of data points equivalent under group action. Two-step embeddings are considered. First, a group invariant is applied to account for equivalences, and then secondly, a linear embedding takes it down to low-dimensions. Our results require hypotheses on discriminability of the applied invariant, such notions related to seperating invariants (Dufresne, 2008), and completeness in pattern recognition (Kakarala, 1992). In the latter theorem, the embedding complexity depends on the size of the canonical part, which may be significantly smaller than the whole data set, up to a factor equal to the size the group.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.