Two dimensional numerical simulations of Supercritical Accretion Flows revisited

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

We study the dynamics of super-Eddington accretion flows by performing two-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamic simulations. Compared with previous works, in this paper we include the TθϕT_{θϕ} component of the viscous stress and consider various values of the viscous parameter αα. We find that when TθϕT_{θϕ} is included, the rotational speed of the high-latitude flow decreases, while the density increases and decreases at the high and low latitudes, respectively. We calculate the radial profiles of inflow and outflow rates. We find that the inflow rate decreases inward, following a power law form of M˙in∝rs\dot{M}_{\rm in}\propto r^s. The value of ss depends on the magnitude of αα and is within the range of ∼0.4−1.0\sim 0.4-1.0. Correspondingly, the radial profile of density becomes flatter compared with the case of a constant M˙(r)\dot{M}(r). We find that the density profile can be described by ρ(r)∝r−pρ(r)\propto r^{-p}, and the value of pp is almost same for a wide range of αα ranging from α=0.1α=0.1 to 0.0050.005. The inward decrease of inflow accretion rate is very similar to hot accretion flows, which is attributed to the mass loss in outflows. To study the origin of outflow, we analyze the convective stability of slim disk. We find that depending on the value of αα, the flow is marginally stable (when αα is small) or unstable (when αα is large). This is different from the case of hydrodynamical hot accretion flow where radiation is dynamically unimportant and the flow is always convectively unstable. We speculate that the reason for the difference is because radiation can stabilize convection. The origin of outflow is thus likely because of the joint function of convection and radiation, but further investigation is required.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.