Paper detail

Two-dimensional MHD models of solar magnetogranulation. Dynamics of magnetic elements

We present the results of a statistical analysis of the Doppler shifts and the asymmetry parameters of V profiles of the Fe I 630.25 nm line produced by 2D MHD simulations of solar granulation. The realism of the simulations tested using the magnetic ratio of Fe I 524.71 and 525.02 nm lines. The Stokes spectra were synthesized in snapshots with a mixed polarity field having a mean magnetic flux density of 0.2 mT and mean unsigned field strength of 35 mT. We found that downflows with a velocity of 0.5 km/s predominate, on the average, in areas with some network magnetic elements at the disk center. In separate strong fluxtubes the average velocity is equal to 3 km/s and the maximum velocity is 9 km/s. In weak diffuse magnetic fields upflows dominate. Their average velocity is 0.5 km/s and maximal one is 3 km/s. The V-profile asymmetry depends on the spatial resolution. The V profiles synthesized with high spatial resolution (35 km) have average amplitude and area asymmetries -1%, 1%, respectively. The asymmetry scatter is \pm70% for weak profiles and \pm10% for strong ones. The profiles with low spatial resolution (700 km) have average amplitude and area asymmetries 3%, -2\%, respectively. Low spatial resolution is a reason why the amplitude asymmetry is always positive and greater than the area asymmetry in V profiles observed. We found weak correlation between the asymmetry of V profiles and velocity. Upflows cause negative asymmetry, on the average, and downflows cause positive asymmetry. We examined center-to-limb variations of vertical velocity in magnetic elements. Beginning from cos theta = 0.9, the average velocity abruptly increases from 0.5 to 2 km/s and then slightly varies closer to the limb. We found nonlinear oscillations of vertical velocity with power peaks in the 5-minute and 3-minute bands.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.