Paper detail

Two dimensional Meixner random vectors of class ${\mathcal M}_L$

The paper is divided into two parts. In the first part we lay down the foundation for defining the joint annihilation-preservation-creation decomposition of a finite family of, not necessarily commutative random variables, and show that this decomposition is essentially unique. In the second part we show that any two, not necessarily commutative, random variables $X$ and $Y$, for which the vector space spanned by their annihilation, preservation, and creation operators equipped with the bracket given by the commutator, forms a Lie algebra, are equivalent, up to an invertible linear transformation to two independent Meixner random variables with mixed preservation operators. In particular if $X$ and $Y$ commute, then they are equivalent, up to an invertible linear transformation to two independent classic Meixner random variables. To show this we start with a small technical condition called "non-degeneracy".

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.