Paper detail

Two diffraction cones of elastic scattering and structural symmetry conjecture

The energy dependence of the differential cross-section of elastic proton-proton scattering in the ISR--LHC energy range is discussed for fixed values of momentum transfer in the region of the forward diffraction cone, in the region beyond the second maximum of $dσ/dt$ and in the vicinity of the dip-bump structure. As can be seen from the currently available experimental data, the differential cross-section in the region beyond the second maximum has exactly the same properties as in the forward diffraction cone, including the existence of a stationary point, that is, we observe a second diffraction cone, which has the same origin as the forward peak. The simplest natural explanation for this experimental fact is that the amplitude of high energy elastic scattering is the sum of two similar terms that have the same status and differ only in the values of parameters. The energy dependence of $dσ/dt$ for a fixed $t$ in the region of the dip-bump structure, where these two terms interfere, confirms the above observations. We discuss the possible origin of the two-component structure of the high energy elastic scattering amplitude and explain this by the structural symmetry of the amplitude.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.