Paper detail

Two decades of km-resolution satellite-based measurements of the precipitable water vapor above the Atacama Desert

The Atacama Desert has long been established as an excellent site for submillimeter observations. Yet identifying potentially optimal locations for a new facility within this region can require long field campaigns that rely on the construction of weather stations and radiometer facilities to take data over sufficiently long timescales. Meanwhile, high-level remote sensing data products from satellites have generally only been available at >25 km resolution, limiting their utility for astronomical site selection. We aim to improve and expedite the process of site selection through the use of km-resolution satellite data. We analyze the daytime precipitable water vapor (PWV) values inferred using near-IR measurements from the MODIS Aqua and Terra satellites, comparing the level-2 satellite products to those from existing ground-based measurements from the radiometer at the Atacama Pathfinder Experiment (APEX) site. Since the APEX radiometer data has been extensively tested and compared to atmospheric transmission models, particularly in low-PWV conditions of interest for astronomy, we use these data to provide a re-calibration of the MODIS data for the entire region. After re-calibration, the satellite data allow mapping of the PWV across the region, and we identify several promising sites. We demonstrate a potentially powerful method for siting new facilities such as AtLAST and extensions to global very long baseline interferometry networks like the EHT. Further, our findings identify a trend in both the APEX and MODIS data, and indicate that the PWV has increased moderately over the past two decades. We verify this trend exists in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) climate models, and show that it is worse in the case of greater increase in the average global temperature.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.