Paper detail

Two Conditions for Galaxy Quenching: Compact Centres and Massive Haloes

We investigate the roles of two classes of quenching mechanisms for central and satellite galaxies in the SDSS ($z<0.075$): those involving the halo and those involving the formation of a compact centre. For central galaxies with inner compactness $Σ_{\rm 1kpc} \sim 10^{9-9.4}M_{\odot} {\rm kpc}^{-2}$, the quenched fraction $f_{q}$ is strongly correlated with $Σ_{\rm 1kpc}$ with only weak halo mass $M_{\rm h}$ dependence. However, at higher and lower $Σ_{\rm 1kpc}$, sSFR is a strong function of $M_{\rm h}$ and mostly independent of $Σ_{\rm 1kpc}$. In other words, $Σ_{\rm 1kpc} \sim 10^{9-9.4} M_{\odot} {\rm kpc}^{-2}$ divides galaxies into those with high sSFR below and low sSFR above this range. In both the upper and lower regimes, increasing $M_{\rm h}$ shifts the entire sSFR distribtuion to lower sSFR without a qualitative change in shape. This is true even at fixed $M_{*}$, but varying $M_{*}$ at fixed $M_{\rm h}$ adds no quenching information. Most of the quenched centrals with $M_{\rm h} > 10^{11.8}M_{\odot}$ are dense ($Σ_{\rm 1kpc} > 10^{9}~ M_{\odot} {\rm kpc}^{-2}$), suggesting compaction-related quenching maintained by halo-related quenching. However, 21% are diffuse, indicating only halo quenching. For satellite galaxies in the outskirts of halos, quenching is a strong function of compactness and a weak function of host $M_{\rm h}$. In the inner halo, $M_{\rm h}$ dominates quenching, with $\sim 90\%$ of the satellites being quenched once $M_{\rm h} > 10^{13}M_{\odot}$. This regional effect is greatest for the least massive satellites. As demonstrated via semi-analytic modelling with simple prescriptions for quenching, the observed correlations can be explained if quenching due to central compactness is rapid while quenching due to halo mass is slow.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.