Paper detail

Two Compton-Thick Active Nuclei in Arp 220?

Narrow-band spectral imaging with sub-pixel resolution of the Chandra-ACIS archival observation of the ULIRG merger Arp 220 strongly suggests two Compton thick nuclei, spatially coincident with the infrared and radio emitting nuclear clusters, and separated by 1" (~ 365 pc at a distance of 76 Mpc). These previously undetected highly obscured AGNs - West (W) and East (E) - are imaged, and separated from neighboring sources, in the 6-7 keV band, where the Fe-K lines dominate the emission. The western nucleus is also detected at energies above 7 keV. We estimate Fe-K equivalent width ~ 1 keV or possibly greater for both sources, and observed 2-10 keV luminosities L_X < 3.2 x 10^40 erg/s (W) and <1.3 x 10^40 erg/s (E). From the observed Fe-K lines luminosities{, and assuming on the basis of the XMM-Newton spectrum that 40% of this may be from the 6.4 keV component, we evaluate 2-10 keV intrinsic luminosities L_X ~ 1 x 10^42 erg/s (W) and L_X ~ 0.4 x 10^42 erg/s (E). The inferred X-ray luminosity is at least a factor of 3 higher than that expected from a pure starburst with the bolometric luminosity of Arp 220. For a typical AGN SED the bolometric luminosities are 5.2 x 10^43 erg/s (W) and 2 x 10^42 erg/s (E).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.