Paper detail

Two-Component Variability of the Semi-Regular Pulsating Star U Delphini

Photometric analysis of photometric variability of the semi-regular pulsating variable U Del is analyzed. From the international AFOEV database, 6231 brightness values in the time interval JD 2451602-55378 were chosen. For the periodogram analysis, we have used a trigonometric polynomial fit. Using the criterion of minimal variance of the approximation at arguments of observations, the optimal degree is s=1. Initial epoch for maximum is T0=JD2453340(3), the period P=1198(4)d. Mean brightness at maximum is 6.624(5), at minimum 7.124(5), i.e. the amplitude is 0.499(5)m. Besides this slow variability, there is a faster oscillation of a period of 119.45(6)d, amplitude 0.303(5)m and an initial epoch for maximum 2453215.1(5). These results are mean during the time interval after that analyzed in the catalogue of Chinarova and Andronov (2000). Also the method of "running sines" with a filter half-width Delta t=0.5P. The local mean (averaged over a short period) brightness varies in a range 6.58-7.41m, the semi-amplitude exhibits very strong variations from 0.01 to 0.46m. The phase is also variable - typically of a full amplitude of 0.5. Close to JD 2452589, occurred a phase jump by a complete period during a descending branch of a slow wave. This effect was not observed during other cycles. No significant correlation between mean brightness and amplitude of short-period oscillation was found. Despite significant variability of amplitude, the periodic contribution is not statistically significant. Also characteristics of individual brightness extrema were found. The study was made in a course of the international project "Inter-Longitude Astronomy" (Andronov et al., 2010) and national project "Ukrainian Virtual Observatory (Vavilova et al., 2012).

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.