Paper detail

Two-component magnetohydrodynamical outflows around young stellar objects Interplay between stellar magnetospheric winds and disc-driven jets

We present the first-ever simulations of non-ideal magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) stellar magnetospheric winds coupled with disc-driven jets where the resistive and viscous accretion disc is self-consistently described. These innovative MHD simulations are devoted to the study of the interplay between a stellar wind (having different ejection mass rates) and an MHD disc-driven jet embedding the stellar wind. The transmagnetosonic, collimated MHD outflows are investigated numerically using the VAC code. We first investigate the various angular momentum transports occurring in the magneto-viscous accretion disc. We then analyze the modifications induced by the interaction between the two components of the outflow. Our simulations show that the inner outflow is accelerated from the central object's hot corona thanks to both the thermal pressure and the Lorentz force. In our framework, the thermal acceleration is sustained by the heating produced by the dissipated magnetic energy due to the turbulence. Conversely, the outflow launched from the resistive accretion disc is mainly accelerated by the magneto-centrifugal force.}{The simulations show that the MHD disc-driven outflow extracts angular momentum more efficiently than do viscous effects in near-equipartition, thin-magnetized discs where turbulence is fully developed. We also show that, when a dense inner stellar wind occurs, the resulting disc-driven jet has a different structure, namely a magnetic structure where poloidal magnetic field lines are more inclined because of the pressure caused by the stellar wind. This modification leads to both an enhanced mass-ejection rate in the disc-driven jet and a larger radial extension that is in better agreement with the observations, besides being more consistent.

preprint2006arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.