Paper detail

Two Close-Separation Quasar-Quasar Pairs in the Large Bright Quasar Survey

We present photometric and spectroscopic observations of two close quasar-quasar pairs found in the Large Bright Quasar Survey (LBQS) (Hewett et al. 1995, AJ, 109, 1498). The two components of the 2153-2056 pair ($z=1.845$, $Δθ=7\farcs8$, $B=17.9$ and 21.3) have the same redshifts within the relatively large uncertainty, $Δv_{A-B} =-1100\pm1500 km s^{-1}$, of the observations. The quasars are most likely spatially coincident although the possibility that the pair is the result of gravitational lensing cannot be ruled out. The two components of 1148+0055 ($z=1.879$, $B=18.5$ and $z=1.409$, $B=21.1$, $Δθ=3\farcs9$) have disjoint redshifts and the pair has attracted some attention in the context of gravitational lensing (e.g. Wampler 1997, ApJ, 476, L55) following the independent discovery of the pair by Surdej and collaborators. Four close, $Δθ\le10\farcs0$, quasar-quasar pairs have now been discovered in the LBQS and we discuss the probability of identifying pairs with disjoint redshifts and of locating spatially coincident pairs from the systematic investigation of the well-defined quasar catalogue.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.