Two characterizations of simple circulant tournaments

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

The \textit{acyclic disconnection} ω→(D)\overrightarrow{ω}(D) (resp. the \textit{directed triangle free disconnection } ω→3(D)\overrightarrow{ω}_{3}(D)) of a digraph DD is defined as the maximum possible number of connected components of the underlying graph of D∖A(D∗)D\setminus A(D^{\ast }) where D∗D^{\ast } is an acyclic (resp. a directed triangle free) subdigraph of DD. In this paper, we generalize some previous results and solve some problems posed by V. Neumann-Lara (The acyclic disconnection of a digraph, Discrete Math. 197/198 (1999), 617-632). Let C→2n+1(J)\overrightarrow{C}_{2n+1}(J) be a circulant tournament. We prove that C→2n+1(J)\overrightarrow{C}_{2n+1}(J) is $\overrightarrow{% ω}$-keen and ω3→\overrightarrow{ω_{3}}-keen, respectively, and % \overrightarrow{ω}(\overrightarrow{C}_{2n+1}(J))=\overrightarrow{% ω}_{3}(\overrightarrow{C}_{2n+1}(J))=2 for every C→\overrightarrow{C}% _{2n+1}(J). Finally, it is showed that ω→3(\overrightarrow{ω}_{3}(% \overrightarrow{C}_{2n+1}(J))=2, C→2n+1(J)\overrightarrow{C}_{2n+1}(J) is simple and JJ is aperiodic are equivalent propositions.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.