Paper detail

Two-atom interaction energies with one atom in an excited state: van der Waals potentials vs. level shifts

I revisit the problem of the interaction between two dissimilar atoms with one atom in an excited state, recently addressed by the authors of Refs.[1-3], and for which precedent approaches have given conflicting results. In the first place, I discuss to what extent Refs.[1], [2] and [3] provide equivalent results. I show that the phase-shift rate of the two-atom wave function computed in Ref.[1], the van der Waals potential of the excited atom in Ref.[2] and the level shift of the excited atom in Ref.[3] possess equivalent expressions in the quasistationary approximation. In addition, I show that the level shift of the ground state atom computed in Ref.[3] is equivalent to its van der Waals potential. A diagrammatic representation of all those quantities is provided. The equivalences among them are however not generic. In particular, it is found that for the case of the interaction between two identical atoms excited, the phase-shift rate and the van der Waals potentials differ. Concerning the conflicting results of previous approaches in regards to the spatial oscillation of the interactions, I conclude in agreement with Refs.[1,3] that they refer to different physical quantities. The impacts of free-space dissipation and finite excitation rates on the dynamics of the potentials are analyzed. In contrast to Ref.[3], the oscillatory versus monotonic spatial forms of the potentials of each atom are found not to be related to the reversible versus irreversible nature of the excitation transfer involved.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.