Paper detail

Two approaches for describing the Casimir interaction with graphene: density-density correlation function versus polarization tensor

The comparison studies of theoretical approaches to the description of the Casimir interaction in layered systems including graphene is performed. It is shown that at zero temperature the approach using the polarization tensor leads to the same results as the approach using the longitudinal density-density correlation function of graphene. An explicit expression for the zero-temperature transverse density-density correlation function of graphene is provided. We further show that the computational results for the Casimir free energy of graphene-graphene and graphene-Au plate interactions at room temperature, obtained using the temperature-dependent polarization tensor, deviate significantly from those using the longitudinal density-density correlation function defined at zero temperature. We derive both the longitudinal and transverse density-density correlation functions of graphene at nonzero temperature. The Casimir free energy in layered structures including graphene, computed using the temperature-dependent correlation functions, is exactly equal to that found using the polarization tensor.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.