Paper detail

Twin-width and Limits of Tractability of FO Model Checking on Geometric Graphs

The complexity of the problem of deciding properties expressible in FO logic on graphs -- the FO model checking problem (parameterized by the respective FO formula), is well-understood on so-called sparse graph classes, but much less understood on hereditary dense graph classes. Regarding the latter, a recent concept of twin-width [Bonnet et al., FOCS 2020] appears to be very useful. For instance, the question of these authors [CGTA 2019] about where is the exact limit of fixed-parameter tractability of FO model checking on permutation graphs has been answered by Bonnet et al. in 2020 quite easily, using the newly introduced twin-width. We prove that such exact characterization of hereditary subclasses with tractable FO model checking naturally extends from permutation to circle graphs (the intersection graphs of chords in a circle). Namely, we prove that under usual complexity assumptions, FO model checking of a hereditary class of circle graphs is in FPT if and only if the class excludes some permutation graph. We also prove a similar excluded-subgraphs characterization for hereditary classes of interval graphs with FO model checking in FPT, which concludes the line a research of interval classes with tractable FO model checking started in [Ganian et al., ICALP 2013]. The mathematical side of the presented characterizations -- about when subclasses of the classes of circle and permutation graphs have bounded twin-width, moreover extends to so-called bounded perturbations of these classes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.