Paper detail

Turing pattern or system heterogeneity? A numerical continuation approach to assessing the role of Turing instabilities in heterogeneous reaction-diffusion systems

Turing patterns in reaction-diffusion (RD) systems have classically been studied only in RD systems which do not explicitly depend on independent variables such as space. In practise, many systems for which Turing patterning is important are not homogeneous with ideal boundary conditions. In heterogeneous systems with stable steady states, the steady states are also necessarily heterogeneous which is problematic for applying the classical analysis. Whilst there has been some work done to extend Turing analysis to some heterogeneous systems, for many systems it is still difficult to determine if a stable patterned state is driven purely by system heterogeneity or if a Turing instability is playing a role. In this work, we try to define a framework which uses numerical continuation to map heterogeneous RD systems onto a sensible nearby homogeneous system. This framework may be used for discussing the role of Turing instabilities in establishing patterns in heterogeneous RD systems. We study the Schnakenberg and Gierer-Meinhardt models with spatially heterogeneous production as test problems. It is shown that for sufficiently large system heterogeneity (large amplitude spatial variations in morphogen production) it is possible that Turing-patterned and base states become coincident and therefore impossible to distinguish. Other exotic behaviour is also shown to be possible. We also study a novel scenario in which morphogen is produced locally at levels that could support Turing patterning but on intervals/patches which are on the scale of classical critical domain lengths. Without classical domain boundaries, Turing patterns are allowed to bleed through; an effect noted by other authors. In this case, this phenomena effectively changes the critical domain length. Indeed, we even note that this phenomena may also effectively couple local patches together and drive instability in this way.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.