Paper detail

Turbulent viscosity by convection in accretion discs - a self-consistent approach

The source of viscosity in astrophysical accretion flows is still a hotly debated issue. We investigate the contribution of convective turbulence to the total viscosity in a self-consistent approach, where the strength of convection is determined from the vertical disc structure itself. Additional sources of viscosity are parametrized by a beta-viscosity prescription, which also allows an investigation of self-gravitating effects. In the context of accretion discs around stellar mass and intermediate mass black holes, we conclude that convection alone cannot account for the total viscosity in the disc, but significantly adds to it. For accretion rates up to 10% of the Eddington rate, we find that differential rotation provides a sufficiently large underlying viscosity. For higher accretion rates, further support is needed in the inner disc region, which can be provided by an MRI-induced viscosity. We briefly discuss the interplay of MRI, convection and differential rotation. We conduct a detailed parameter study of the effects of central masses and accretion rates on the disc models and find that the threshold value of the supporting viscosity is determined mostly by the Eddington ratio with only little influence from the central black hole mass.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.