Paper detail

Turbulent Reacceleration of Streaming Cosmic Rays

Subsonic, compressive turbulence transfers energy to cosmic rays (CRs), a process known as non-resonant reacceleration. It is often invoked to explain observed ratios of primary to secondary CRs at $\sim \rm GeV$ energies, assuming wholly diffusive CR transport. However, such estimates ignore the impact of CR self-confinement and streaming. We study these issues in stirring box magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations using Athena++, with field-aligned diffusive and streaming CR transport. For diffusion only, we find CR reacceleration rates in good agreement with analytic predictions. When streaming is included, reacceleration rates depend on plasma $β$. Due to streaming-modified phase shifts between CR and gas variables, they are slower than canonical reacceleration rates in low-$β$ environments like the interstellar medium (ISM) but remain unchanged in high-$β$ environments like the intracluster medium (ICM). We also quantify the streaming energy loss rate in our simulations. For sub-Alfvénic turbulence, it is resolution-dependent (hence unconverged in large scale simulations) and heavily suppressed -- by an order of magnitude -- compared to the isotropic loss rate $v_{A} \cdot \nabla P_{\rm CR} / P_{\rm CR} \sim v_{A}/L_{0}$, due to misalignment between the mean field and isotropic CR gradients. Counterintuitively, and unlike acceleration efficiencies, CR losses are almost independent of magnetic field strength over $β\sim 1-100$ and are, therefore, not the primary factor behind lower acceleration rates when streaming is included. While this paper is primarily concerned with how turbulence affects CRs, in a follow-up paper (Bustard and Oh, in prep), we consider how CRs affect turbulence by diverting energy from the MHD cascade, altering the pathway to gas heating and steepening the turbulent power spectrum.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.