Paper detail

Turbulent cascade, bottleneck and thermalized spectrum in hyperviscous flows

In many simulations of turbulent flows the viscous forces $ν\nabla^2 {\bf u}$ are replaced by a hyper-viscous term $-ν_p(-\nabla^2)^{p}{\bf u}$ in order to suppress the effect of viscosity at the large scales. In this work we examine the effect of hyper-viscosity on decaying turbulence for values of $p$ ranging from $p=1$ (regular viscosity) up to $p=100$. Our study is based on direct numerical simulations of the Taylor-Green vortex for resolutions from $512^3$ to $2048^3$. Our results demonstrate that the evolution of the total energy $E$ and the energy dissipation $ε$ remain almost unaffected by the order of the hyper-viscosity used. However, as the order of the hyper-viscosity is increased ,the energy spectrum develops a more pronounced bottleneck that contaminates the inertial range. At the largest values of $p$ examined, the spectrum at the bottleneck range has a positive power-law behavior $E(k)\propto k^α$ with the power-law exponent $α$ approaching the value obtained in flows at thermal equilibrium $α=2$. This agrees with the prediction of Frisch et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 144501 (2008)] who suggested that at high values of $p$, the flow should behave like the truncated Euler equations (TEE). Nonetheless, despite the thermalization of the spectrum, the flow retains a finite dissipation rate up to the examined order, which disagrees with the predictions of the TEE system implying suppression of energy dissipation. We reconcile the two apparently contradictory results, predicting the value of $p$ for which the hyper-viscous Navier-Stokes goes over to the TEE system and we discuss why thermalization appears at smaller values of $p$.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.