Paper detail

Tunneling conductance due to discrete spectrum of Andreev states

We study tunneling spectroscopy of discrete subgap Andreev states in a superconducting system. If the tunneling coupling is weak, individual levels are resolved and the conductance $G(V)$ at small temperatures is composed of a set of resonant Lorentz peaks which cannot be described within perturbation theory over tunnelling strength. We establish a general formula for their widths and heights and show that the width of any peak scales as normal-state tunnel conductance, while its height is $\lesssim 2e^2/h$ and depends only on contact geometry and the spatial profile of the resonant Andreev level. We also establish an exact formula for the single-channel conductance that takes the whole Andreev spectrum into account. We use it to study the interference of Andreev reflection processes through different levels. The effect is most pronounced at low voltages, where an Andreev level at $E_j$ and its conjugate at $-E_j$ interfere destructively. This interference leads to the quantization of the zero-bias conductance: G(0) equals $2e^2/h$ (or 0) if there is (there is not) a Majorana fermion in the spectrum, in agreement with previous results from $S$-matrix theory. We also study $G(eV>0)$ for a system with a pair of almost decoupled Majorana fermions with splitting $E_0$ and show that at lowest $E_0$ there is a zero-bias Lorentz peak of width $W$ as expected for a single Majorana fermion (a topological NS-junction) with a narrow dip of width $E_0^2/W$ at zero bias, which ensures $G(0)=0$ (the NS-junction remains trivial on a very small energy scale). As the coupling $W$ gets stronger, the dip becomes narrower, which can be understood as enhanced decoupling of the remote Majorana fermion. Then the zero-bias dip requires extremely low temperatures $T\lesssim E_0^2/W$ to be observed.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.