Paper detail

Tuning the convergence angle for optimum STEM performance

The achievable instrumental performance of a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) is determined by the size and shape of the incident electron probe. The most important optical factor in achieving the optimum probe profile is the radius of the probe-forming aperture, which determines the convergence semi-angle of the illumination. What is often overlooked however is that small deviations from this optimum can degrade both the resolution and interpretability of image contrast. A 30% error in aperture radius can lead to a factor of 2 contrast reduction in typical lattice spacings, and a 5 Å error in the thickness measurement of thin layers (such as gate oxides). Theoretical calculations of the optimum convergence angles, from a wave-optical consideration of the probe forming conditions, are explained and their consequences discussed. An experimental approach to the measurement and tuning of the convergence angle is then introduced. This is intended for uncorrected electron microscopes. For corrected instruments, Cs=0, and Cc usually determines the choice of aperture - see e.g. ULTRAMICROSCOPY 108, (2008) 1454-1466

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.