Paper detail

Tuning structural relaxations, mechanical properties, and degradation timescale of PLLA during hydrolytic degradation by blending with PLCL-PEG

Poly-L-lactide (PLLA) is a popular choice for medical devices due to its bioresorbability and superior mechanical properties compared with other polymers. However, although PLLA has been investigated for use in bioresorbable cardiovascular stents, it presents application-specific limitations which hamper device therapies. These include low toughness and strength compared with metals used for this purpose, and slow degradation. Blending PLLA with novel polyethylene glycol functionalised poly(L-lactide-co-$\varepsilon$-caprolactone) (PLCL-PEG) materials has been investigated here to tailor the mechanical properties and degradation behaviour of PLLA. This exciting approach provides a foundation for a next generation of bioresorbable materials whose properties can be rapidly tuned. The degradation of PLLA was significantly accelerated by addition of PLCL-PEG. After 30 days of degradation, several structural changes were observed in the polymer blends, which were dependent on the level of PLCL-PEG addition. Blends with low PLCL-PEG content displayed enthalpy relaxation, resulting in embrittlement, while blends with high PLCL-PEG content displayed crystallisation, due to enhanced chain mobility brought on by chain scission, also causing embrittlement. Moderate PLCL-PEG additions (10% PLCL(70:30)-PEG and 20 - 30% PLCL(80:20)-PEG) stabilised the structure, reducing the extent of enthalpy relaxation and crystallisation and thus retaining ductility. Compositional optimisation identified a sweet spot for this blend strategy, whereby the ductility was enhanced while maintaining strength. Our results indicate that blending PLLA with PLCL-PEG provides an effective method of tuning the degradation timescale and mechanical properties of PLLA, and provides important new insight into the mechanisms of structural relaxations that occur during degradation, and strategies for regulating these.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.