Paper detail

Tuning morphology and thermal transport of asymmetric smart polymer blends by macromolecular engineering

A grand challenge in designing polymeric materials is to tune their properties by macromolecular engineering. In this context, one of the drawbacks that often limits broader applications under high temperature conditions is their poor thermal conductivity $κ$. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we establish a structure-property relationship in hydrogen bonded polymer blends for possible improvement of $κ$. For this purpose, we investigate two experimentally relevant hydrogen bonded systems -- one system consists of short poly({N}-acryloyl piperidine) (PAP) blended with longer chains of poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and the second system is a mixture of PAA and short poly(acrylamide) (PAM) chains. Simulation results show that PAA-PAP blends are at the onset of phase separation over the full range of PAP monomer mole fraction $ϕ_{PAP}$, which intensifies even more for $ϕ_{PAP} > 0.3$. While PAA and PAP interact with preferential hydrogen bonding, phase separation is triggered by the dominant van der Waals attraction between the hydrophobic side groups of PAP. However, if PAP is replaced with PAM, which has a similar chemical structure as PAP without the hydrophobic side group, PAA-PAM blends show much improved solubility. Better solubility is due to the preferential hydrogen bonding between PAA and PAM. As a result, PAM oligomers act as cross-linking bridges between PAA chains resulting in a three dimensional highly cross-linked network. While $κ$ for PAA-PAP blends remain almost invariant with $ϕ_{PAP}$, PAA-PAM systems show improved $κ$ with increasing PAM concentration and also with respect to PAA-PAP blends. Consistent with the theoretical prediction for the thermal transport of amorphous polymers, we show that $κ$ is proportional to the materials stiffness, i.e., the bulk modulus K and sound velocity v of PAA-PAM blends.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.