Paper detail

Triangular libration points in the R3BP under combined effects of oblateness, radiation and power-law profile

We study the effects of oblateness up to $J_4$ of the primaries and power-law density profile (PDP) on the linear stability of libration location of an infinitesimal mass within the framework of restricted three body problem (R3BP), by using a more realistic model in which a disc with PDP is rotating around the common center of the system mass with perturbed mean motion. The existence and stability of triangular equilibrium points have been explored. It has been shown that triangular equilibrium points are stable for $0<μ<μ_c$ and unstable for $μ_c\leqμ\leq1/2$, where $μ_c$ denotes the critical mass parameter. We find that, the oblateness up to $J_2$ of the primaries and the radiation reduces the stability range while the oblateness up to $J_4$ of the primaries increases the size of stability both in the context where PDP is considered and ignored. The PDP has an effect of about $\approx0.01$ reduction on the application of $μ_c$ to Earth-Moon and Jupiter-Moons systems. We find that the comprehensive effects of the perturbations have a stabilizing proclivity. However, the oblateness up to $J_2$ of the primaries and the radiation of the primaries have tendency for instability, while coefficients up to $J_4$ of the primaries have stability predisposition. In the limiting case $c=0$, and also by setting appropriate parameter(s) to zero, our results are in excellent agreement with the ones obtained previously. Libration points play very important role in space mission and as a consequence, our results have a practical application in space dynamics and related areas. The model may be applied to study the navigation and stationkeeping operations of spacecraft (infinitesimal mass) around the Jupiter (more massive) -Callisto (less massive) system, where PDP account for the circumsolar ring of asteroidal dust, which has a cloud of dust permanently in its wake.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.