Paper detail

Tree-like resolution complexity of two planar problems

We consider two CSP problems: the first CSP encodes 2D Sperner's lemma for the standard triangulation of the right triangle on $n^2$ small triangles; the second CSP encodes the fact that it is impossible to match cells of $n \times n$ square to arrows (two horizontal, two vertical and four diagonal) such that arrows in two cells with a common edge differ by at most $45^\circ$, and all arrows on the boundary of the square do not look outside (this fact is a corollary of the Brower's fixed point theorem). We prove that the tree-like resolution complexities of these CSPs are $2^{Θ(n)}$. For Sperner's lemma our result implies $Ω(n)$ lower bound on the number of request to colors of vertices that is enough to make in order to find a trichromatic triangle; this lower bound was originally proved by Crescenzi and Silvestri. CSP based on Sperner's lemma is related with the $\rm PPAD$-complete problem. We show that CSP corresponding to arrows is also related with a $\rm PPAD$-complete problem.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.