Paper detail

Traversable wormhole solutions with non-exotic fluid in framework of $f(Q)$ gravity

The presence of exotic matter for the existence of the wormhole geometry has been an unavoidable problem in GR. In recent studies researchers have tried to deal with this issue using modified gravity theories where the WH geometry is explained by the extra curvature terms and NEC's are not violated signifying the standard matter in the WH geometry. In the present article we are trying to find the solutions of traversable wormholes with normal matter in the throat within the framework of symmetric teleparallel gravity $f(Q)$ where $Q$ is the non metricity scalar which defines the gravitational interaction. We will examine the wormhole geometries for three forms of function $f(Q)$. First is the linear form $f(Q)=αQ$, second a non -linear form $f(Q)=αQ^2 + β$ and third one a more general quadratic form $f(Q)=αQ^2 + βQ + γ$ with $α$, $β$ and $γ$ being the constants. For all the three cases the shape function is taken as $b(r) = {\frac{r_{0}\ln(r+1)}{\ln({r_0}+1)}}$ where $r_0$ is the throat radius. A special variable redshift function is considered for the discussion. All the energy conditions are then examined for the existence and the stability of the wormhole geometry.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.