Paper detail

Trapping of solute atoms at grain boundaries in GdNi2

Lattice locations of 111In impurity probe atoms in intermetallic GdNi2 were studied as a function of alloy composition and temperature using perturbed angular correlation spectroscopy (PAC). Three nuclear quadrupole interaction signals were detected and their equilibrium site fractions were measured up to 700 oC. Two signals have well-defined electric field gradients (EFGs) and are attributed to In-probes on Gd- and Ni-sites in a well-ordered lattice. A third, inhomogeneously broadened signal was observed at low temperature. This is attributed to trapping, or segregation, of In-probes to lattice sinks such as grain boundaries (GB) that have a large multiplicity of local environments and EFGs. Changes in site fractions were reversible above 300oC. Measurements were made on a pair of samples that were richer and poorer in Gd. Remarkably, the GB-site was populated only in the more Gd-rich sample. This is explained by the hypothesis that excess Gd segregates to the grain boundaries and provides a lower enthalpy environment for In-probe atoms. Observations are discussed in relation to a three-level quantum system. Enthalpy differences between levels were determined from measurements of temperature dependences of ratios of site fractions. The enthalpy of transfer of In-probes from the Gd- to Ni-sublattice was found to be much smaller in the Gd-rich sample. This is attributed to a large temperature-dependence in the degeneracies of levels available to In-solutes in the phase, leading to an effective transfer enthalpy that differs greatly from the difference in site-enthalpies. A possible scenario is discussed. Different segregation enthalpies were measured for In-solute transferring from GB sites to Gd- and Ni-sites, whereas only an average value can be determined through macroscopic measurements.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.