Paper detail

Transverse momentum spectra of strange hadrons within extensive and nonextensive statistics

Using generic (non)extensive statistics, in which the underlying system autonomously manifests its extensive and nonextensive statistical nature, we extract various fit parameters from the CMS experiment and compare these to the corresponding results obtained from Tsallis and Boltzmann statistics. The present study is designed to indicate the possible variations between the three types of statistical approaches and characterizes their dependence on collision energy, multiplicity, and size of the system of interest. We analyze the transverse momentum spectra $p_T$ of the strange hadrons \Kslxi produced in Pb+Pb collisions, at 2.76 TeV, in p+Pb collisions, at 5.02 TeV, and in $p+p$ collisions, at 7 TeV. From the comparison of the resulting fit parameters; temperature $T$, volume $V$, and nonextensvie parameter $d$, with calculations based on Tsallis and Boltzmann statistics, remarkable differences between the three types of statistics are determined besides a strong dependence on size and type of the colliding system. We conclude that the produced particles with large masses and large strange quantum numbers likely freeze out earlier than the ones with smaller masses and less strange quantum numbers. This conclusion seems not depending on the type of the particle or the collision but apparently manifesting transitions from chemical (larger temperature) to the kinetic freezeouts (lower temperature). For the first university (equivalent) class c=1, the decrease in the second one, $d$, with increasing energy and collision centrality highlights that the system departs from nonextensivity (non-equilibrium) and apparently approaches extensivity (equilibrium) indicating that the Boltzmann statistics becomes the proper statistical approach in describing that system. Last but not least, we present analytical expressions for the energy dependence of the various fit parameters.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.