Paper detail

Transitions from P to NP-hardness: the case of the Linear Ordering Problem

In this paper we evaluate how constructive heuristics degrade when a problem transits from P to NP-hard. This is done by means of the linear ordering problem. More specifically, for this problem we prove that the objective function can be expressed as the sum of two objective functions, one of which is associated with a P problem (an exact polynomial time algorithm is proposed to solve it), while the other is associated with an NP-hard problem. We study how different constructive algorithms whose behaviour only depends on univariate information perform depending on the contribution of the P or NP-hard components of the problem. A number of experiments are conducted with reduced dimensions, where the global optimum of the problems is known, giving different weights to the NP-hard component, while the weight of the P component is fixed. It is observed how the performance of the constructive algorithms gets worse as the weight given to the NP-hard component increases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.