Paper detail

Transitions between distinct compaction regimes in complexes of multivalent cationic lipids and DNA

We use X-ray scattering and molecular simulations to investigate the structural properties of complexes of multivalent cationic lipids and DNA molecules. At low mole fraction of neutral lipids (NLs), $Φ_{\rm NL}$, the complexes show dramatic DNA compaction down to essentially close packed DNA arrays with a DNA interaxial spacing $d_{\rm DNA}=25Å$. A gradual increase in $Φ_{\rm NL}$ does not lead to a continuous increase in $d_{\rm DNA}$ as observed for DNA complexes of monovalent cationic lipids (CLs). Instead, distinct spacing regimes exist, with sharp transitions between them. Three packing states have been identified: (i) close packed, (ii) condensed, but not close packed, with $d_{\rm DNA}=27-28Å$, and (iii) an expanded state, where $d_{\rm DNA}$ increases gradually with $Φ_{\rm NL}$. Based on our experimental and computational results, we conclude that the DNA condensation is mediated by the multivalent cationic lipids, which assemble between the negatively charged DNA rods. Quite remarkably, the computational results show that the less tightly packed structure in regime (ii) is thermodynamically more stable than the close packed structure in regime (i). Accordingly, the constant DNA spacing observed in regime (ii) is attributed to lateral phase coexistence between this stable CL-DNA complex and neutral membranes. This finding may explain the reduced transfection efficiency measured for such complexes: Transfection involves endosomal escape and disassembly of the complex, and these processes are inhibited by the high thermodynamic stability. Our results, which demonstrate the existence of an inverse correlation between the stability and transfection activity of lamellar CL-DNA complexes are, therefore, consistent with a recently proposed model of cellular entry.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.