Paper detail

Transition Redshift: New constraints from parametric and nonparametric methods

In this paper, we use the Cosmokinematics approach to study the accelerated expansion of the Universe. This is a model independent approach and depends only on the assumption that the Universe is homogeneous and isotropic and is described by the FRW metric. We parametrize the deceleration parameter, $q(z)$, to constrain the transition redshift ($z_t$) at which the expansion of the Universe goes from a decelerating to an accelerating phase. We use three different parametrizations of $q(z)$ namely, $q_\I(z)=q_{\textnormal{\tiny\textsc{1}}}+q_{\textnormal{\tiny\textsc{2}}}z$, $q_\II (z) = q_\3 + q_\4 \ln (1 + z)$ and $q_\III(z)=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{q_{\textnormal{\tiny\textsc{5}}}}{(1+z)^2}$. A joint analysis of the age of galaxies, strong lensing and supernovae Ia data indicates that the transition redshift is less than unity i.e. $z_t<1$. We also use a nonparametric approach (LOESS+SIMEX) to constrain $z_t$. This too gives $z_t<1$ which is consistent with the value obtained by the parametric approach.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.