Paper detail

Transition, intermittency and phase interference effects in airfoil secondary tones and acoustic feedback loop

A large eddy simulation is performed to study secondary tones generated by a NACA0012 airfoil at angle of attack of $α= 3^{\circ}$ with freestream Mach number of $M_{\infty} = 0.3$ and Reynolds number of $Re = 5 \times 10^4$. Laminar separation bubbles are observed over the suction side and near the trailing edge, on the pressure side. Flow visualization and spectral analysis are employed to investigate vortex shedding aft of the suction side separation bubble. Vortex interaction results in merging or bursting such that coherent structures or turbulent packets are advected towards the trailing edge leading to different levels of noise emission. Despite the intermittent occurrence of laminar-turbulent transition, the noise spectrum depicts a main tone with multiple equidistant secondary tones. To understand the role of flow instabilities on the tones, the linearized Navier-Stokes equations are examined in its operator form through bi-global stability and resolvent analyses, and by time evolution of disturbances using a matrix-free method. These linear global analyses reveal amplification of disturbances over the suction side separation bubble. Non-normality of the linear operator leads to further transient amplification due to modal interaction among eigenvectors. Two-point, one time autocovariance calculations of pressure along the spanwise direction elucidate aspects of the acoustic feedback loop mechanism in the non-linear solutions. This feedback process is self-sustained by acoustic waves radiated from the trailing edge, which reach the most sensitive flow location between the leading edge and the separation bubble, as identified by the resolvent analysis. Leading edge disturbances arising from secondary diffraction and phase interference among the most unstable frequencies computed in the eigenspectrum are also shown to have an important role in the feedback loop.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.