Paper detail

Transition from anti-solar to solar-like differential rotation: Dependence on Prandtl number

(abridged) Context: Late-type stars such as the Sun rotate differentially due to the interaction of turbulent convection and rotation. Aims: The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of the thermal Prandtl number on the transition from anti-solar (slow equator, fast poles) to solar-like (fast equator, slow poles) differential rotation. Methods: Three-dimensional hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic simulations in semi-global spherical wedge geometry are used to model convection zones of solar-like stars. Results: The overall convective velocity amplitude increases as the Prandtl number decreases in accordance with earlier studies. The transition from anti-solar to solar-like differential rotation is insensitive to the Prandtl number for Prandtl numbers below unity but for Prandtl numbers greater than unity, solar-like differential rotation becomes significantly harder to excite. Magnetic fields and more turbulent regimes with higher fluid and magnetic Reynolds numbers help in achieving solar-like differential rotation in near-transition cases. Solar-like differential rotation occurs only in cases with radially outward angular momentum transport at the equator. The dominant contribution to such outward transport near the equator is due to prograde propagating thermal Rossby waves. Conclusions: The differential rotation is sensitive to the Prandtl number only for large Prandtl numbers in the parameter regime explored in the current study. Magnetic fields have a greater effect on the differential rotation, although the inferred presence of a small-scale dynamo does not lead to drastically different results in the present study. The dominance of the thermal Rossby waves in the simulations is puzzling given the non-detection in the Sun. The current simulations are shown to be incompatible with the currently prevailing mean-field theory of differential rotation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.