Paper detail

Transition between Thin Film Boiling and Evaporation on Nanoporous Membranes Near the Kinetic Limit

Nanoporous structures including single nanopores and nanoporous membranes have been utilized as a platform to study fundamental liquid-vapor phase change heat transfer (PCHT) processes as well as a promising candidate for high flux heat dissipation. Both thin film boiling and evaporation through nanoporous structures have been demonstrated to achieve high heat flux, but they are usually considered two mutually exclusive regimes operated under vastly different conditions, and the factors dictating how close the PCHT process is to the kinetic limit are elusive. In this work, we utilized a unique transition between thin film boiling and evaporation through nanoporous membranes to clarify the factors determining the heat flux and heat transfer coefficient (HTC) with respect to the kinetic limit conditions. We unambiguously showed the controllable transition from boiling to evaporation, when the liquid receded into the nanopores and provided additional driving force from capillary pumping sustained in the nanoscale pores. We showed that this transition is universal and can be understood from a simple fluid transport model for all the four types of fluids we studied, which cover a wide span of surface tension (water, ethanol, isopropanol (IPA), FC-72). More importantly, PCHT conditions at the transition points between boiling and evaporation were close to those of the kinetic limit of all these fluids. However, further increase of the heat flux beyond the transition points led to decreasing HTC and deviation from the kinetic limit, which can be attributed to the increasing vapor resistance in the vapor space and inside the nanopores. This increasing vapor resistance was also confirmed by experiments on IPA with different vapor pressures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.