Paper detail

Transformations of Rectangular Dualizable Graphs

A plane graph is said to be a rectangular graph if each of its edges can be oriented horizontal or vertical, its internal regions are four-sided and it has a rectangular enclosure. If dual of a planar graph is a rectangular graph, then the graph is said to be a rectangular dualizable graph (RDG). In this paper, we present adjacency transformations between RDGs and present polynomial time algorithms for their transformations. An RDG $\mathcal{G}=(V, E)$ is called maximal RDG (MRDG) if there does not exist an RDG $\mathcal{G'}=(V, E')$ with $E' \supset E$. An RDG $\mathcal{G}=(V, E)$ is said to be an edge-reducible if there exists an RDG $\mathcal{G'}=(V, E')$ such that $E\supset E'$. If an RDG is not edge-reducible, it is said to be an edge-irreducible RDG. We show that there always exists an MRDG for a given RDG. We also show that an MRDG is edge-reducible and can always be transformed to a minimal one (an edge-irreducible RDG).

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.