Paper detail

Transformations of polar Grassmannians preserving certain intersecting relations

Let $Π$ be a polar space of rank $n\ge 3$. Denote by ${\mathcal G}_{k}(Π)$ the polar Grassmannian formed by singular subspaces of $Π$ whose projective dimension is equal to $k$. Suppose that $k$ is an integer not greater than $n-2$ and consider the relation ${\mathfrak R}_{i,j}$, $0\le i\le j\le k+1$ formed by all pairs $(X,Y)\in {\mathcal G}_{k}(Π)\times {\mathcal G}_{k}(Π)$ such that $\dim_{p}(X^{\perp}\cap Y)=k-i$ and $\dim_{p} (X\cap Y)=k-j$ ($X^{\perp}$ consists of all points of $Π$ collinear to every point of $X$). We show that every bijective transformation of ${\mathcal G}_{k}(Π)$ preserving ${\mathfrak R}_{1,1}$ is induced by an automorphism of $Π$ and the same holds for the relation ${\mathfrak R}_{0,t}$ if $n\ge 2t\ge 4$ and $k=n-t-1$. In the case when $Π$ is a finite classical polar space, we establish that the valencies of ${\mathfrak R}_{i,j}$ and ${\mathfrak R}_{i',j'}$ are distinct if $(i,j)\ne (i',j')$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.