Paper detail

Transformations of Matrix Structures Work Again

In 1989 we proposed to employ Vandermonde and Hankel multipliers to transform into each other the matrix structures of Toeplitz, Hankel, Vandermonde and Cauchy types as a means of extending any successful algorithm for the inversion of matrices having one of these structures to inverting the matrices with the structures of the three other types. Surprising power of this approach has been demonstrated in a number of works, which culminated in ingeneous numerically stable algorithms that approximated the solution of a nonsingular Toeplitz linear system in nearly linear (versus previuosly cubic) arithmetic time. We first revisit this powerful method, covering it comprehensively, and then specialize it to yield a similar acceleration of the known algorithms for computations with matrices having structures of Vandermonde or Cauchy types. In particular we arrive at numerically stable approximate multipoint polynomial evaluation and interpolation in nearly linear arithmetic time.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.