Paper detail

Transference number in polymer electrolytes: mind the reference-frame gap

The transport coefficients, in particular the transference number, of electrolyte solutions are important design parameters for electrochemical energy storage devices. Recent observation of negative transference numbers in PEO-LiTFSI under certain conditions has generated much discussion about its molecular origins, by both experimental and theoretical means. However, one overlooked factor in these efforts is the importance of the reference frame (RF). This creates a non-negligible gap when comparing experiment and simulation, because the fluxes in the experimental measurements of transport coefficients and in the linear response theory used in the molecular dynamics simulation are defined in different RFs. In this work, we show that by applying a proper RF transformation, a much improved agreement between experimental and simulation results can be achieved. Moreover, it is revealed that the anion mass and the anion-anion correlation, rather than ion aggregates, play a crucial role for the reported negative transference numbers.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.