Paper detail

Transfer learning for affordable and high quality tunneling splittings from instanton calculations

The combination of transfer learning (TL) a low level potential energy surface (PES) to a higher level of electronic structure theory together with ring-polymer instanton (RPI) theory is explored and applied to malonaldehyde. The RPI approach provides a semiclassical approximation of the tunneling splitting and depends sensitively on the accuracy of the PES. With second order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) as the low-level (LL) model and energies and forces from coupled cluster singles, doubles and perturbative triples (CCSD(T)) as the high-level (HL) model, it is demonstrated that CCSD(T) information from only 25 to 50 judiciously selected structures along and around the instanton path suffice to reach HL-accuracy for the tunneling splitting. In addition, the global quality of the HL-PES is demonstrated through a mean average error of 0.3 kcal/mol for energies up to 40 kcal/mol above the minimum energy structure (a factor of 2 higher than the energies employed during TL) and $< 2 $ cm$^{-1}$ for harmonic frequencies compared with computationally challenging normal mode calculations at the CCSD(T) level.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.