Paper detail

Transcriptional regulation: Effects of promoter proximal pausing on speed, synchrony and reliability

Recent whole genome polymerase binding assays have shown that a large proportion of unexpressed genes have pre-assembled RNA pol II transcription initiation complex stably bound to their promoters. Some such promoter proximally paused genes are regulated at transcription elongation rather than at initiation; it has been proposed that this difference allows these genes to both express faster and achieve more synchronous expression across populations of cells, thus overcoming molecular "noise" arising from low copy number factors. It has been established experimentally that genes which are regulated at elongation tend to express faster and more synchronously; however, it has not been shown directly whether or not it is the change in the regulated step {\em per se} that causes this increase in speed and synchrony. We investigate this question by proposing and analyzing a continuous-time Markov chain model of polymerase complex assembly regulated at one of two steps: initial polymerase association with DNA, or release from a paused, transcribing state. Our analysis demonstrates that, over a wide range of physical parameters, increased speed and synchrony are functional consequences of elongation control. Further, we make new predictions about the effect of elongation regulation on the consistent control of total transcript number between cells, and identify which elements in the transcription induction pathway are most sensitive to molecular noise and thus may be most evolutionarily constrained. Our methods produce symbolic expressions for quantities of interest with reasonable computational effort and can be used to explore the interplay between interaction topology and molecular noise in a broader class of biochemical networks. We provide general-purpose code implementing these methods.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.