Paper detail

Traits for chemical evolution in solar twins: Trends of neutron-capture elements with stellar age

The physical processes driving chemical evolution in the Milky Way can be probed using the distribution of abundances in low-mass FGK type stars in space phase at different times. During their final stages of evolution stars experience nucleosynthesis several times, each at different timescales and producing different chemical elements, so finding abundance ratios that have simple variations across cosmic times remains a challenge. Using the sample of 80 solar twins for which ages and abundances of 30 elements were measured with high precision by Bedell et al 2018, we searched for all possible abundance ratios combinations that show linear trends with age. We found 55 such ratios, all combining a neutron-capture element and another one produced by different nucleosynthesis channels. We recovered the ratios of [Y/Mg], [Ba/Mg] and [Al/Y] reported previously in the literature, and found that [C/Ba] had the largest dependency with age with a slope of $0.049 \pm 0.003~\mathrm{dex/Gyr}$, imposing constraints on the magnitude of time dependency of abundance ratios in solar twins. Our results suggest using s-process elements, in lieu of Fe, as a reference for constraining chemical evolution models of the solar neighbourhood. Our study illustrates hows a large variety of chemical elements measured from high resolution spectra is key in facing current challenges in understanding the formation and evolution of our Galaxy.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.