Paper detail

Training Data Selection for Accuracy and Transferability of Interatomic Potentials

Advances in machine learning (ML) techniques have enabled the development of interatomic potentials that promise both the accuracy of first principles methods and the low-cost, linear scaling, and parallel efficiency of empirical potentials. Despite rapid progress in the last few years, ML-based potentials often struggle to achieve transferability, that is, to provide consistent accuracy across configurations that significantly differ from those used to train the model. In order to truly realize the promise of ML-based interatomic potentials, it is therefore imperative to develop systematic and scalable approaches for the generation of diverse training sets that ensure broad coverage of the space of atomic environments. This work explores a diverse-by-construction approach that leverages the optimization of the entropy of atomic descriptors to create a very large ($>2\cdot10^{5}$ configurations, $>7\cdot10^{6}$ atomic environments) training set for tungsten in an automated manner, i.e., without any human intervention. This dataset is used to train polynomial as well as multiple neural network potentials with different architectures. For comparison, a corresponding family of potentials were also trained on an expert-curated dataset for tungsten. The models trained to entropy-optimized data exhibited vastly superior transferability compared to the expert-curated models. Furthermore, while the models trained with heavy user input (i.e., domain expertise) yield the lowest errors when tested on similar configurations, out-sample predictions are dramatically more robust when the models are trained on a deliberately diverse set of training data. Herein we demonstrate the development of both accurate and transferable ML potentials using automated and data-driven approaches for generating large and diverse training sets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.