Paper detail

Tradeoffs in Resampling and Filtering for Imbalanced Classification

Imbalanced classification problems are extremely common in natural language processing and are solved using a variety of resampling and filtering techniques, which often involve making decisions on how to select training data or decide which test examples should be labeled by the model. We examine the tradeoffs in model performance involved in choices of training sample and filter training and test data in heavily imbalanced token classification task and examine the relationship between the magnitude of these tradeoffs and the base rate of the phenomenon of interest. In experiments on sequence tagging to detect rare phenomena in English and Arabic texts, we find that different methods of selecting training data bring tradeoffs in effectiveness and efficiency. We also see that in highly imbalanced cases, filtering test data using first-pass retrieval models is as important for model performance as selecting training data. The base rate of a rare positive class has a clear effect on the magnitude of the changes in performance caused by the selection of training or test data. As the base rate increases, the differences brought about by those choices decreases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.