Paper detail

Tradeoff between Ergodic Rate and Delivery Latency in Fog Radio Access Networks

Wireless content caching has recently been considered as an efficient way in fog radio access networks (FRANs) to alleviate the heavy burden on capacity-limited fronthaul links and reduce delivery latency. In this paper, an advanced minimal delay association policy is proposed to minimize latency while guaranteeing spectral efficiency in F-RANs. By utilizing stochastic geometry and queueing theory, closed-form expressions of successful delivery probability, average ergodic rate, and average delivery latency are derived, where both the traditional association policy based on accessing the base station with maximal received power and the proposed minimal delay association policy are concerned. Impacts of key operating parameters on the aforementioned performance metrics are exploited. It is shown that the proposed association policy has a better delivery latency than the traditional association policy. Increasing the cache size of fog-computing based access points (F-APs) can more significantly reduce average delivery latency, compared with increasing the density of F-APs. Meanwhile, the latter comes at the expense of decreasing average ergodic rate. This implies the deployment of large cache size at F-APs rather than high density of F-APs can promote performance effectively in F-RANs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.