Paper detail

Tracking down R Coronae Borealis stars using the WISE All-Sky survey

R Coronae Borealis stars (RCBs) are the best candidates to be the products of white dwarf mergers in the intermediate mass range ($0.4<M_{tot}<1.1$ M$_{\odot}$). After a merger, a He envelope surrounds a CO core, and a short-lived supergiant phase starts. RCBs correspond to that phase. They are known to be hydrogen-deficient and carbon-rich supergiant stars. They are rare; They are also highly diverse in chemical abundances, brightness and photosphere temperature. To understand their evolutionary path, constrain their spatial distribution and test their formation rate, we aim to increase significantly the number of known RCBs. To do so, we need first to create a list of targets of interest rich in RCB stars, that will be subsequently followed-up spectroscopically to reveal their true nature. Fortunately, RCBs are producing dust and are therefore surrounded by warm circumstellar dust shells. Using the all-sky 2MASS and WISE infrared surveys, our goal is to discriminate RCBs among other dust-producing stars. A series of selection criteria was applied to colour-colour diagrams and to the brightness of all objects catalogued. The criteria were designed using all 102 known RCB stars. RCB SED models were also used to understand the limits of the criteria and the possible bias in terms of shell temperature selected. The analysis was complicated by the unpredictable photometric declines that RCB stars are known to undergo. With a detection efficiency of about 85\%, our analysis selected only 2356 targets among the 563 million objects catalogued in the WISE All-Sky survey. This short list of targets of interest supersedes a previously published one made from the preliminary WISE data release. This list, published in the CDS Vizier database, will allow us to increase significantly the number of known RCB stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.